Two dimensions of information dictate authorization inside Rundeck:
The chapter on Authentication discusses how to assign group memberships to users.
The remainder of this section will describe how to use the access control policy.
Note from the project team: The authorization layer is an early work in progress. Please share your ideas on the IRC or mailing list.
Access to running or modifying Jobs is managed in an access control policy defined using the aclpolicy YAML document. This file contains a number of policy elements that describe what user group is allowed to perform which actions.
Please read over this document for information on how to define it, and how to grant access for certain actions to certain resources:
Policies can be organized into more than one file to help organize access by group or pattern of use. The normal Rundeck install will have generated a policy for the "admin" group. Not all users will need to be given "admin" access level to control and modify all Jobs. More typically, a group of users will be given access to just a subset of Jobs.
File listing: admin.aclpolicy example
description: Admin project level access control. Applies to resources within a specific project.
context:
project: '.*' # all projects
for:
resource:
- equals:
kind: job
allow: [create] # allow create jobs
- equals:
kind: node
allow: [read,create,update,refresh] # allow refresh node sources
- equals:
kind: event
allow: [read,create] # allow read/create events
adhoc:
- allow: [read,run,kill] # allow running/killing adhoc jobs
job:
- allow: [read,update,delete,run,kill] # allow read/write/delete/run/kill of all jobs
node:
- allow: [read,run] # allow read/run for all nodes
by:
group: admin
---
description: Admin Application level access control, applies to creating/deleting projects, admin of user profiles, viewing projects and reading system information.
context:
application: 'rundeck'
for:
resource:
- equals:
kind: project
allow: [create] # allow create of projects
- equals:
kind: system
allow: [read] # allow read of system info
- equals:
kind: user
allow: [admin] # allow modify user profiles
project:
- match:
name: '.*'
allow: [read,admin] # allow view/admin of all projects
by:
group: admin
The example policy document above demonstrates the access granted to the users in group "admin".
Two separate policies define two levels of access control. The first is the "project" context, which allows access to actions on resources within a specific project. The second is the "application" level context, which allows access to things like creating projects, access to projects, managing users, and access to system information.
As described in the aclpolicy-v10(5) definition, access is granted or denied to specific "resources". Resources can take two forms:
For example, you might want to restrict access to a job or jobs within a certain group. This corresponds to specific "job" resources with a "group" property matching a certain pattern.
You might also want to restrict who can create new jobs. Since a new job does not exist yet, you cannot create a rule for this action to apply to an existing job. Which means this corresponds to a generic resource with a "kind" called "job".
Clients of the Web API may use the Token Authentication method. These clients are placed in the special authorization group called api_token_group
.
api_token_group
Rundeck declares a number of actions that can be referenced inside the access control policy document.
The actions and resources are divided into project scope and application scope:
You define application scope rules in the aclpolicy, by declaring this context:
context:
application: 'rundeck'
These are the Application scope actions that can be allowed or denied via the aclpolicy:
The following table summarizes the generic and specific resources and the actions you can restrict in the application scope:
Type | Resource Kind | Properties | Actions | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
resource |
project |
none | create |
Create a new project |
resource |
system |
none | read |
Read system information |
resource |
user |
none | admin |
Modify user profiles |
Type | Properties | Actions | Description |
---|---|---|---|
project |
"name" | read |
View a project in the project list |
project |
"name" | admin |
Modify project configuration |
You define project scope rules in the aclpolicy by declaring this context:
context:
project: "(regex)"
The regex can match all projects using ".*", or you can simply put the project name.
Note that for projects not matched by an aclpolicy, no actions will be granted to users.
Also note that to hide projects completely from users, you would need to grant or deny the "read" access to the project in the Application Scope.
These are the Application scope actions that can be allowed or denied via the aclpolicy:
The following table summarizes the generic and specific resources and the actions you can restrict in the project scope:
Type | Resource Kind | Actions | Description |
---|---|---|---|
resource |
job |
create |
Create a new Job |
" | node |
read |
Read node information |
" | " | create |
Create new node entries |
" | " | update |
Modify node entries |
" | " | refresh |
Refresh node entry from a URL |
" | event |
read |
Read history event information |
" | " | create |
Create arbitrary history event entries |
Type | Properties | Actions | Description |
---|---|---|---|
adhoc |
read |
Read adhoc execution output | |
" | run |
Run an adhoc execution | |
" | kill |
Kill an adhoc execution | |
job |
"name","group" | read |
View a Job and its executions |
" | update |
Modify a job | |
" | delete |
Delete a job | |
" | run |
Run a job | |
" | kill |
Kill a running job | |
" | create |
Create the matching job | |
node |
"rundeck_server", "nodename", ... | read |
View the node in the UI (see Node resource properties) |
" | run |
Run jobs/adhoc on the node |
Note: see Node resource properties for more node resource properties for authorization.
Recall that defining rules for a resource type is done in this way:
for:
resource:
- equals:
kind: 'project'
allow: [create]
Whereas defining rules for specific resources of a certain type is done in this way:
for:
job:
- equals:
name: bob
allow: [run]
The properties available are the attributes that are defined on the node, so you can apply authorizations based on tag, osName, hostname, etc. The special rundeck_server
property will be set to "true" for the Rundeck server node only, and "false" for all other nodes.
Any custom attributes can be used as well.
Name | Description |
---|---|
nodename |
Name of the node |
username |
Authentication username |
hostname |
Hostname of the node |
description |
Description of the node |
tags |
Set of tags. Can use with the contains: filter. |
osName |
Operating System name |
osFamily |
Operating System family, e.g. "unix" or "windows" |
osVersion |
Operating System version |
osArch |
Operating System architecture |
rundeck_server |
A value set to "true" if the node is the Rundeck server node |
Below is an example policy document demonstrating policy actions to create limited access for a group of users. Users in the group "restart_user", are allowed to run three jobs in the "adm" group, Restart, stop and start. By allowing run
but not read
, the "stop" and "start" jobs will not be visible.
File listing: restart_user.aclpolicy example
description: Limited user access for adm restart action
context:
project: '.*'
for:
job:
- equals:
group: 'adm'
name: 'Restart'
allow: [run,read]
- equals:
group: 'adm'
name: 'stop'
allow: [run]
- equals:
group: 'adm'
name: 'start'
allow: [run]
by:
group: [restart_user]
After defining an aclpolicy file to grant access to a particular group of users, you may find them getting "unauthorized" messages or complaints that certain actions are not possible.
To diagnose this, begin by checking two bits:
rundeck.audit.log
log file. The authorization facility generates fairly low level messages describing how the policy is matched to the user context.For each entry in the audit log, you'll see all decisions leading up to either a AUTHORIZED or a REJECTED message. It's not uncommon to see REJECTED messages followed by AUTHORIZED. The important thing is to look at the last decision made.